M.G.H. v. J.L.H.
Applicant failed to prove a material financial deterioration that would justify terminating spousal support because his overall economic position remained close to the basis of the original award and the Respondent retained ongoing need and entitlement given the long traditional marriage and her limited capacity for retraining; balancing need and ability to pay, the court exercised discretion to temporarily reduce support to $800 per month during the Applicant's rehabilitation/training, maintain the life insurance beneficiary requirement while support remains payable, require recalculation of arrears by Maintenance Enforcement and impose a moratorium on collection of past arrears pending...
- Citation
- 2015 NSSC 259
- Parties
- Applicant (payer): M. G. H.; Respondent (recipient): J. L. H.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Vary Corollary Relief Judgment (spousal Support) / Variation Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Variation partially granted: spousal support reduced from $1,000 to $800 per month effective from the month in 2014 in which payments were reduced without court order; termination request denied; life insurance beneficiary requirement to remain while support payable; moratorium on collection of past arrears until...
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Support, Material Change of Circumstances, Self Sufficiency, Life Insurance Security, Arrears, Moratorium on Collection, Double Dipping (pension Inclusion)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M. G. H.
Applicant (payer)
J. L. H.
Respondent (recipient)
Procedural Posture
Application to Vary Corollary Relief Judgment (spousal Support) / Variation Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant has established a material change in circumstances sufficient to terminate or significantly reduce spousal support
- 2 Whether the Respondent has failed to diligently pursue self-sufficiency
- 3 Whether the Applicant's pension should be included in income for support (double dipping)
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to prove a material financial deterioration that would justify terminating spousal support because his overall economic position remained close to the basis of the original award and the Respondent retained ongoing need and entitlement given the long traditional marriage and her limited capacity for retraining; balancing need and ability to pay, the court exercised discretion to temporarily reduce support to $800 per month during the Applicant's rehabilitation/training, maintain the life insurance beneficiary requirement while support remains payable, require recalculation of arrears by Maintenance Enforcement and impose a moratorium on collection of past arrears pending...
Court Disposition
Variation partially granted: spousal support reduced from $1,000 to $800 per month effective from the month in 2014 in which payments were reduced without court order; termination request denied; life insurance beneficiary requirement to remain while support payable; moratorium on collection of past arrears until...
Orders
- Spousal support reduced to $800 per month effective the month in 2014 when payments were reduced without court order
- Support payments to be reassessed by either party at end of Applicant's course or when disability entitlement changes
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment