MacDonald v. MacDonald
The 1997 amendments and Guidelines constituted a material change permitting variation. Matthew remains a "child of the marriage" until completion of his undergraduate degree and proposed MBA absent a material change. Variation was granted and made effective as of the date of filing of the application (February 4, 2000). The father's income for Guidelines purposes was fixed at $104,300 (three‑year average with adjustment) and the mother's at $41,600, producing a table amount of $1,288 per month; the father must pay specified lump sums and s.7 shares and arrears with credits for prior educational contributions, and payments to children when they reside at university are to be made directly...
- Citation
- 2001 NSSC 158
- Parties
- Petitioner/respondent: Gordon E. MacDonald; Respondent/applicant: Nona Catherine MacDonald
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Act Variation (child Support) / Application for Variation (heard and Decided)
- Outcome
- Application to vary child support granted in part; variation effective February 4, 2000 (date of filing) and orders made for ongoing and retroactive payments and allocation of s.7 expenses.
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Support Order, Retroactivity of Support Orders, Definition of Child of the Marriage, Income Determination Under Guidelines, Post Secondary Education Expenses (s.7), Calculation of Arrears and Credits
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gordon E. MacDonald
Petitioner/respondent
Nona Catherine MacDonald
Respondent/applicant
Procedural Posture
Divorce Act Variation (child Support) / Application for Variation (heard and Decided)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether amendments to the Divorce Act and Guidelines constitute a material change of circumstances
- 2 Whether Matthew remains a "child of the marriage" entitled to support
- 3 Whether variation of child support should be made retroactive and to what date
Ratio Decidendi
The 1997 amendments and Guidelines constituted a material change permitting variation. Matthew remains a "child of the marriage" until completion of his undergraduate degree and proposed MBA absent a material change. Variation was granted and made effective as of the date of filing of the application (February 4, 2000). The father's income for Guidelines purposes was fixed at $104,300 (three‑year average with adjustment) and the mother's at $41,600, producing a table amount of $1,288 per month; the father must pay specified lump sums and s.7 shares and arrears with credits for prior educational contributions, and payments to children when they reside at university are to be made directly...
Court Disposition
Application to vary child support granted in part; variation effective February 4, 2000 (date of filing) and orders made for ongoing and retroactive payments and allocation of s.7 expenses.
Orders
- Father to pay mother $3,000 forthwith.
- Father to pay mother $1,288 per month (table amount) while both children live in mother's residence; if only one child lives at home father to pay $804 per month.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment