Lewis v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

Lewis v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

The motion for a stay was denied because the applicant failed to demonstrate irreparable harm and the balance of convenience favoured the Minister, rendering a stay inappropriate.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2008 FCA 245
Parties
Appellant: Veneisha Yolanda Lewis; Respondent: The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
15 August 2008
Procedural Posture
Immigration Stay of Removal Motion / Motion for Stay Pending Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal
Outcome
Stay of removal denied
Legal Topics
Stay of Removal, Irreparable Harm, Balance of Convenience, Pending Appeal
Source Language
en
Immigration Law Administrative Law Procedural Law Stay of Removal Irreparable Harm Balance of Convenience Pending Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Veneisha Yolanda Lewis

Appellant

The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Immigration Stay of Removal Motion / Motion for Stay Pending Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether removal will cause irreparable harm to the appellant or her daughter
  2. 2 Whether the balance of convenience favours granting a stay
  3. 3 Whether there is a serious issue to be tried (left undecided)

Ratio Decidendi

The motion for a stay was denied because the applicant failed to demonstrate irreparable harm and the balance of convenience favoured the Minister, rendering a stay inappropriate.

Court Disposition

Stay of removal denied

Orders

  • Appellant's motion for a stay of her removal to Grenada on August 17, 2008 is denied.