Bar Attraction Plus v. Canada (Attorney General)

Bar Attraction Plus v. Canada (Attorney General)

The motion for leave to be represented by a non‑lawyer was dismissed because the proposed representative did not demonstrate understanding of the nature of the proceedings and a lawyer would better serve the interests of justice; the court also amended the style of cause to correctly identify the parties.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2006 FCA 329
Parties
Appellant: Viateur Mercier; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen (Attorney General of Canada)
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 October 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Motion to Permit Non‑lawyer Representation; Amendment of Style of Cause
Outcome
Motion dismissed; style of cause amended
Legal Topics
Non‑lawyer Representation, Style of Cause Amendment, Leave to Be Represented, Motions
Source Language
en
Procedural Law Court Practice Legal Representation Non‑lawyer Representation Style of Cause Amendment Leave to Be Represented Motions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Viateur Mercier

Appellant

Her Majesty the Queen (Attorney General of Canada)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Motion to Permit Non‑lawyer Representation; Amendment of Style of Cause

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should be granted leave to be represented by a non‑lawyer
  2. 2 Whether the style of cause should be amended to correctly identify the parties

Ratio Decidendi

The motion for leave to be represented by a non‑lawyer was dismissed because the proposed representative did not demonstrate understanding of the nature of the proceedings and a lawyer would better serve the interests of justice; the court also amended the style of cause to correctly identify the parties.

Court Disposition

Motion dismissed; style of cause amended

Orders

  • The style of cause is amended to identify Viateur Mercier as Appellant and Her Majesty the Queen as Respondent.
  • The appellant's motion for leave to be represented by a non‑lawyer is dismissed.