R. v. Campanella

R. v. Campanella

The Court found no error in the sentencing judge's exercise of discretion and therefore dismissed the appeal against sentence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
C33530
Parties
Appellant: Vincenzo Campanella; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
20 October 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Sentence (sentence Imposed by Justice B. Zabel, Ontario Court of Justice, December 23, 1999); Leave to Appeal Granted by Court of Appeal; Appeal Heard October 17, 2003
Outcome
Leave to appeal sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Appeal, Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Appeal Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vincenzo Campanella

Appellant

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Sentence (sentence Imposed by Justice B. Zabel, Ontario Court of Justice, December 23, 1999); Leave to Appeal Granted by Court of Appeal; Appeal Heard October 17, 2003

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in the exercise of discretion
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal the sentence should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found no error in the sentencing judge's exercise of discretion and therefore dismissed the appeal against sentence.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal sentence granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal sentence granted.
  • Appeal from sentence dismissed.