Cullip Construction v. Vipond Inc.
The Claimant was entitled to recover for rock removal because the Claimant notified the Defendant, the Defendant authorized the work, and the Defendant's own communications acknowledged that extras are normally payable; the Defendant's counterclaim was not sufficiently proven except for limited labour time, so the Adjudicator allowed four hours at $70/hour ($280) as offset, and ordered net payment to the Claimant of $3,202.75.
- Citation
- 2007 NSSM 85
- Parties
- Claimant: Cullip Construction; Defendant: Vipond Inc.
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims (contract and Counterclaim) / Decision
- Outcome
- Judgment for Claimant with net award after offsets and costs
- Legal Topics
- Contract Extras, Excavation/rock Removal, Breach of Contract, Property Damage, Counterclaim, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cullip Construction
Claimant
Vipond Inc.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims (contract and Counterclaim) / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether rock excavation constituted an extra charge under the parties' agreement
- 2 Whether the Defendant is obliged to pay the Claimant for the extra work authorized on site
- 3 Whether the Defendant's counterclaim for a ruptured water line was proven and what damages are recoverable
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant was entitled to recover for rock removal because the Claimant notified the Defendant, the Defendant authorized the work, and the Defendant's own communications acknowledged that extras are normally payable; the Defendant's counterclaim was not sufficiently proven except for limited labour time, so the Adjudicator allowed four hours at $70/hour ($280) as offset, and ordered net payment to the Claimant of $3,202.75.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Claimant with net award after offsets and costs
Orders
- Defendant shall pay Claimant $3,455.75
- Defendant shall pay Claimant $80.00 court costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment