Auciello v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC)

Auciello v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC)

The pleadings did not disclose a reasonable cause of action and the motion judge did not err in striking them; the appeal is dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2015 ONCA 178
Parties
Appellant: Vito Auciello; Respondent: Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC); Respondent: CIBC Mortgages Inc.; Respondent: Home Loans Canada (HLC); Respondent: Home Trust Company; Respondent: Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Collection / Appeal From Order Striking Pleadings (motion Judge: Sidney N. Lederman)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Strike Pleadings, Reasonable Cause of Action, Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Collection Procedure Strike Pleadings Reasonable Cause of Action Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vito Auciello

Appellant

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC)

Respondent

CIBC Mortgages Inc.

Respondent

Home Loans Canada (HLC)

Respondent

Home Trust Company

Respondent

Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Collection / Appeal From Order Striking Pleadings (motion Judge: Sidney N. Lederman)

  1. 1 Whether the pleadings disclosed a reasonable cause of action
  2. 2 Whether the motion judge erred in striking the pleadings
  3. 3 Whether respondents are entitled to costs

Ratio Decidendi

The pleadings did not disclose a reasonable cause of action and the motion judge did not err in striking them; the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Pleadings struck against CIBC for failing to disclose a reasonable cause of action