R. v. Pletnev

R. v. Pletnev

The appeal was dismissed because the appellants failed to establish entitlement to mandamus and the Court of Appeal agreed with the Superior Court's analysis that mandamus was not appropriate in the circumstances.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2018 ONCA 935
Parties
Appellant: Vladimir Pletnev; Appellant: Alla Pletneva; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Superior Court Dismissal of Mandamus Application
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Mandamus, Appeal, Judicial Review, Procedural Dismissal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Judicial Review Mandamus Procedural Law Appeal Procedural Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vladimir Pletnev

Appellant

Alla Pletneva

Appellant

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Superior Court Dismissal of Mandamus Application

  1. 1 Whether the appellants were entitled to a writ of mandamus in relation to the ruling of the Justice of the Peace
  2. 2 Whether the Superior Court erred in dismissing the appellants' application for mandamus

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the appellants failed to establish entitlement to mandamus and the Court of Appeal agreed with the Superior Court's analysis that mandamus was not appropriate in the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.