In the Bankruptcy of Ian Gregory Thow
The June 16, 2005 taking/retention of the paintings occurred within three months of the initial bankruptcy event and had the effect of preferring Vickers; Vickers was not a secured creditor because there was no enforceable security agreement or perfection, and any unpaid seller's lien had been lost when Thow took possession on March 4, 2005; accordingly the transfer/charge is void against the trustee under s.95 BIA and the trustee is entitled to immediate delivery and to treat Vickers as an unsecured creditor.
- Citation
- 2006 BCSC 1414
- Parties
- Bankrupt/debtor: Ian Gregory Thow; Respondent/art Dealer/possessor: Arthur Vickers; Trustee: Mr. Cheevers
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Turnover/possession of Property / Application Heard and Decided (oral Reasons)
- Outcome
- Trustee's application granted; Vickers declared unsecured and transfer void as against trustee
- Legal Topics
- Voidable Preference, Security Interest, Perfection by Possession, Unpaid Seller's Lien, Insolvency, Priority
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian Gregory Thow
Bankrupt/debtor
Arthur Vickers
Respondent/art Dealer/possessor
Mr. Cheevers
Trustee
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Turnover/possession of Property / Application Heard and Decided (oral Reasons)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether transfer of paintings to Vickers within three months of initial bankruptcy event is void under s.95 BIA as a preference
- 2 Whether Vickers held a security interest enforceable under the PPSA in the paintings
- 3 Whether Vickers retained an unpaid vendor's lien or right of retention under the SGA after Thow obtained possession
Ratio Decidendi
The June 16, 2005 taking/retention of the paintings occurred within three months of the initial bankruptcy event and had the effect of preferring Vickers; Vickers was not a secured creditor because there was no enforceable security agreement or perfection, and any unpaid seller's lien had been lost when Thow took possession on March 4, 2005; accordingly the transfer/charge is void against the trustee under s.95 BIA and the trustee is entitled to immediate delivery and to treat Vickers as an unsecured creditor.
Court Disposition
Trustee's application granted; Vickers declared unsecured and transfer void as against trustee
Orders
- Declare Arthur Vickers an unsecured creditor in the bankruptcy of Ian Gregory Thow
- Declare any charge or lien granted by Ian Gregory Thow to Arthur Vickers in the paintings on or about June 16, 2005 fraudulent and void as against the Trustee
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment