Volpak Inc. v. Canada Border Services Agency
The Tribunal's finding that Volpak could have filed for an extension months earlier, notwithstanding the need to assemble security, was within the range of reasonable outcomes on the record; therefore the Court dismisses the judicial review application.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2012 FCA 291
- Parties
- Applicant: Volpak Inc.; Respondent: The President of the Canada Border Services Agency
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal Judgment (federal Court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Tariff Classification, Standard of Review Reasonableness, Customs Act S.60.2
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Volpak Inc.
Applicant
The President of the Canada Border Services Agency
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal Judgment (federal Court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Canadian International Trade Tribunal reasonably denied an extension of time under s.60.2 of the Customs Act to request a re-determination of tariff classification
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's conclusion was reasonable in light of alleged delay caused by assembling security for unpaid duties
- 3 Appropriate standard of review
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's finding that Volpak could have filed for an extension months earlier, notwithstanding the need to assemble security, was within the range of reasonable outcomes on the record; therefore the Court dismisses the judicial review application.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Application for judicial review dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Volpak Inc. v. Canada Border Services Agency Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2012-11-13 Neutral citation 2012 FCA 291 File numbers A-51-12 Decision Content Date: 20121113 Docket: A-51-12 Citation: 2012 FCA 291 CORAM: SHARLOW J.A. STRATAS J.A. WEBB J.A. BETWEEN: VOLPAK INC. Applicant and THE PRESIDENT OF THE CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 13, 2012. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 13, 2012. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: WEBB J.A. Date: 20121113 Docket: A-51-12 Citation: 2012 FCA 291 CORAM: SHARLOW J.A. STRATAS J.A. WEBB J.A. BETWEEN: VOLPAK INC. Applicant and THE PRESIDENT OF THE CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 13, 2012) WEBB J.A. [1] This is an application by Volpak Inc. for judicial review of the decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal dated February 2, 2012 (EP-2011-002). That decision denied the application of Volpak under section 60.2 of the Customs Act, R.S.C. 1985 (2d Supp.), c.1, for an extension of time to request (under section 60 of the Act) that the CBSA re-determine the tariff classification of certain chicken breasts imported by Volpak. [2] The parties agree, as do we, that the standard of review is reasonableness. [3] The Tribunal concluded, for reasons stated at paragraphs 27 and 28 of its reasons, that Volpak could have filed its application for an extension of time months earlier than it did. Volpak argues that it was necessarily delayed by the need to assemble acceptable security for the unpaid amounts. The Tribunal was aware of those facts when it reached its conclusion. That conclusion was reasonably open to the Tribunal on this record. [4] For these reasons, we will dismiss this application for judicial review with costs. “Wyman W. Webb” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-51-12 STYLE OF CAUSE: Volpak Inc. v. The President of the Canada Border Services Agency PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: November 13, 2012 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW, STRATAS AND WEBB JJ.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: WEBB J.A. APPEARANCES: Michael Kaylor FOR THE APPLICANT Pierre-Paul Trottier Luc Vaillancourt FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP Montréal, Québec FOR THE APPLICANT William F. Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT