Canada Judgment

Federal Court

Wenham v. Canada (Attorney General)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court exercised its discretion and dismissed the applicant's motion for costs under Rule 334.39(1)(a),(b),(c), concluding the applicant was not entitled to costs.

Court disposition

Motion for costs dismissed, without costs.

Orders

  • Motion for costs dismissed, without costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

Bruce Wenham

Applicant

Attorney General of Canada

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Class Proceeding / Motion for Costs

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to costs under Federal Courts Rules Rule 334.39(1)(a),(b),(c)

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant sought an order for costs against the respondent under Rule 334.39(1)(a),(b),(c).
Respondent
Respondent opposed the motion, arguing the applicant was not entitled to costs and that the criteria for costs under the rule were not met.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Federal Courts Rules, Rule 334.39(1)

    Costs may be awarded under Rule 334.39 only where the statutory criteria are satisfied.

  2. 02

    Federal Court discretionary jurisprudence

    The court has discretion to refuse costs even where a costs rule is invoked.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court exercised its discretion and dismissed the applicant's motion for costs under Rule 334.39(1)(a),(b),(c), concluding the applicant was not entitled to costs.

Court disposition

Motion for costs dismissed, without costs.

  • Motion for costs dismissed, without costs.

Source and reliance status

Federal Court · 8 May 2020

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Federal Court

Judgment· 8 May 2020

2020 FC 591

Wenham v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2020-05-08 Neutral citation 2020 FC 591 File numbers T-1499-16 Decision Content Date: 20200508 Docket: T-1499-16 Citation: 2020 FC 591 Ottawa, Ontario, May 8, 2020 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Phelan

CLASS PROCEEDING BETWEEN:

BRUCE WENHAM Applicant and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent

ORDER (Applicant’s Motion for Costs) UPON MOTION by the Applicant for an Order for costs under Rule 334.39(1)(a),(b),(c) against the Respondent; AND FOR the Reasons issued with this Order; THIS COURT ORDERS that the motion for costs is dismissed, without costs. Blank “Michael L. Phelan” Blank Judge

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Federal Courts Rules, Rule 334.39(1)(a),(b),(c)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.