Whitecap Resources Inc. v Pulse Seismic Inc. - 2026 Comp Trib 18 - Confidentiality Order - CT-2026-003
The Tribunal concluded that a confidentiality order is necessary and should be issued in substantially the parties' proposed form, with defined Levels A, B and C and prescribed access limitations because affidavit evidence and submissions will include competitively sensitive information (prices, contracts, financials, plans) that could cause specific and direct harm if public; the order establishes who may access each level, permits up to six in‑house counsel and one additional designate per party subject to undertaking and Tribunal objection, requires public redacted versions, and preserves the Tribunal's jurisdiction to resolve disputes and to vary the order.
- Citation
- 2026 Comp Trib 18
- Parties
- Applicant: Whitecap Partnership by its managing partner Whitecap Resources Inc.; Respondent: Pulse Seismic by its managing partner Pulse Seismic Inc.
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave Under Section 103.1 of the Competition Act / Decision on Written Record; Confidentiality Order Issued
- Outcome
- Confidentiality order granted for the leave application under s.103.1, with defined Level A/B/C protections and related procedural requirements.
- Legal Topics
- Leave Under S.103.1, Confidentiality Orders, Protective Orders, Designation of Confidential Information, Access Restrictions for Counsel and Experts
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Whitecap Partnership by its managing partner Whitecap Resources Inc.
Applicant
Pulse Seismic by its managing partner Pulse Seismic Inc.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave Under Section 103.1 of the Competition Act / Decision on Written Record; Confidentiality Order Issued
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a confidentiality order should be issued for the leave application under s.103.1
- 2 What categories/levels of confidentiality (Level A, B, C) are appropriate
- 3 Who may be designated as Designated Representatives and limits on those designations
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal concluded that a confidentiality order is necessary and should be issued in substantially the parties' proposed form, with defined Levels A, B and C and prescribed access limitations because affidavit evidence and submissions will include competitively sensitive information (prices, contracts, financials, plans) that could cause specific and direct harm if public; the order establishes who may access each level, permits up to six in‑house counsel and one additional designate per party subject to undertaking and Tribunal objection, requires public redacted versions, and preserves the Tribunal's jurisdiction to resolve disputes and to vary the order.
Court Disposition
Confidentiality order granted for the leave application under s.103.1, with defined Level A/B/C protections and related procedural requirements.
Orders
- Confidentiality order issued defining Protected Records and Levels A, B and C
- Level A Protected disclosure limited to outside counsel, tribunal personnel, Independent Experts and the Commissioner and staff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment