Murray Estate
There was a latent ambiguity because the will opened as disposing of all property but the residuary percentages totaled 90%; admissible surrounding circumstances (excluding direct statements of the testator) established a drafting error reducing the Salvation Army share to 10% instead of the intended 20%; the court may correct the mistake where the omission is unintentional and the testator's intention can be ascertained, so clause 6(d)(x) was amended to allocate 20% to the Salvation Army, rejecting intestacy and cy-près; special costs awarded to both the Salvation Army and to Watson out of the estate.
- Citation
- 2007 BCSC 1035
- Parties
- Petitioners/executors: Norbert and Gillian Wollbold; Respondent/intestate Heir Representative: David Robert Watson; Respondent/beneficiary: Salvation Army, Public Relations Department, Vancouver; Estate/deceased: Estate of William Walter Robert Murray, Deceased
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/will Construction (petition for Directions) / Chambers Hearing (reasons for Judgment)
- Outcome
- The court construed the will to correct a drafting error: the disputed 10% residuary portion is awarded to the Salvation Army, Public Relations Department, Vancouver (clause amended to 20%); cy-pres and intestacy were rejected; special costs awarded to the Salvation Army and to David Robert Watson payable from the...
- Legal Topics
- Will Construction, Partial Intestacy, Cy Pres, Extrinsic Evidence Admissibility, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Norbert and Gillian Wollbold
Petitioners/executors
David Robert Watson
Respondent/intestate Heir Representative
Salvation Army, Public Relations Department, Vancouver
Respondent/beneficiary
Estate of William Walter Robert Murray, Deceased
Estate/deceased
Procedural Posture
Probate/will Construction (petition for Directions) / Chambers Hearing (reasons for Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the undistributed 10% residuary portion passes to the Salvation Army or results in partial intestacy to next of kin
- 2 Admissibility of solicitor's affidavit and distinction between direct extrinsic evidence of intent and surrounding circumstances
- 3 Whether the court may correct a drafting error to reflect the testator's intention
Ratio Decidendi
There was a latent ambiguity because the will opened as disposing of all property but the residuary percentages totaled 90%; admissible surrounding circumstances (excluding direct statements of the testator) established a drafting error reducing the Salvation Army share to 10% instead of the intended 20%; the court may correct the mistake where the omission is unintentional and the testator's intention can be ascertained, so clause 6(d)(x) was amended to allocate 20% to the Salvation Army, rejecting intestacy and cy-près; special costs awarded to both the Salvation Army and to Watson out of the estate.
Court Disposition
The court construed the will to correct a drafting error: the disputed 10% residuary portion is awarded to the Salvation Army, Public Relations Department, Vancouver (clause amended to 20%); cy-pres and intestacy were rejected; special costs awarded to the Salvation Army and to David Robert Watson payable from the...
Orders
- Clause 6(d)(x) of the will is amended so that twenty (20%) percent of the residuary estate is given to the Salvation Army, Public Relations Department, Vancouver.
- The disputed 10% residuary portion is awarded to the Salvation Army, Public Relations Department, Vancouver.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment