MacInnis v. Arsenault

MacInnis v. Arsenault

The adjudicator found the defendant breached his duty as a reasonably competent contractor by failing to identify and pursue the feasible alternative of obtaining municipal permission to connect to a catch basin and by failing to properly advise the engineer and the client; the breach caused the claimant to incur $1,500 for remediation and the claimant is entitled to recover that amount and the filing fee.

Citation
2004 NSSM 16
Parties
Claimant: JAMES MacINNIS; Defendant: WILLIAM ARSENAULT
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
18 May 2004
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court / Decision
Outcome
Claim allowed in part; judgment for claimant
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Negligence, Damages, Permitting, Drainage Remediation
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JAMES MacINNIS

Claimant

WILLIAM ARSENAULT

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Court / Decision

  1. 1 Whether the contractor breached duties in contract and tort by failing to advise and pursue the optimal drainage solution
  2. 2 Whether access to the municipal catch basin was a feasible alternative and whether the contractor should have pursued a permit
  3. 3 Causation and recoverability of remediation costs paid by the claimant

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator found the defendant breached his duty as a reasonably competent contractor by failing to identify and pursue the feasible alternative of obtaining municipal permission to connect to a catch basin and by failing to properly advise the engineer and the client; the breach caused the claimant to incur $1,500 for remediation and the claimant is entitled to recover that amount and the filing fee.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part; judgment for claimant

Orders

  • Claimant entitled to his filing fee
  • Defendant to pay claimant $1,575.00