Kalkman v. Beveridge
Costs are assessed by issue with Tariff A as the starting point but adjusted under CPR 77.07 to reflect divided success and conduct; because the respondent was substantially successful on the property issues though there was mixed success overall, a lump sum costs award of $25,000.00 inclusive is appropriate to reflect the extent of his success and to do justice between the parties.
- Citation
- 2018 NSSC 178
- Parties
- Petitioner: Cinda Lee Kalkman; Respondent: William Kellock Beveridge
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce / Cost Decision
- Outcome
- Respondent awarded lump sum costs of $25,000.00 inclusive
- Legal Topics
- Spousal Support Quantum and Duration, Equalization of Net Family Property, Interim Spousal Support, Offers to Settle (cpr 10), Costs Assessment and Tariff a, Disclosure and Production
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cinda Lee Kalkman
Petitioner
William Kellock Beveridge
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce / Cost Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether assets were divisible matrimonial property and appropriate equalization payment
- 2 Quantum, duration and retroactivity of spousal support under SSAG
- 3 Appropriate costs scale and application of Tariff A and CPR 77 factors
Ratio Decidendi
Costs are assessed by issue with Tariff A as the starting point but adjusted under CPR 77.07 to reflect divided success and conduct; because the respondent was substantially successful on the property issues though there was mixed success overall, a lump sum costs award of $25,000.00 inclusive is appropriate to reflect the extent of his success and to do justice between the parties.
Court Disposition
Respondent awarded lump sum costs of $25,000.00 inclusive
Orders
- Respondent awarded lump sum costs of $25,000.00 inclusive of the $250.00 previously ordered for interrogatories
- No costs awarded to either party in respect of the interim spousal support hearing and the suit costs application portions of the proceeding
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment