Widrig v. Strazer et al.
The will's clause did not grant an exclusive right of first refusal to Komish; the executors validly rejected Komish's non-cash final offer and lawfully contracted to sell to Widrig; the trial judge properly recalled his unentered specific performance judgment and substituted damages; the Court of Appeal erred in principle in reducing damages and the $40,000 award (except as to personal liability of certain executors) is restored.
- Citation
- [1964] SCR 376
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Ralph Swift Widrig; Respondent/executor: Shirley Mae Strazer; Respondent/public Trustee/executor: Lloyd W. Gardiner; Respondent/executor (estate): The Public Trustee of the Province of Alberta; Respondent/executor's Solicitor/defendant: John W. D. Buchanan; Defendant/contended Purchaser: Harold Komish; Defendant/company: B.C. Yukon Air Service Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 1964
- Procedural Posture
- Action for Specific Performance and Damages Arising From Sale of Testator's Shares; Appeal / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; trial judgment restored except insofar as it awarded personal liability against certain respondents; cross-appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Will Interpretation, Right of First Refusal, Specific Performance, Damages Assessment, Executors' Powers, Jurisdiction to Reopen Judgment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ralph Swift Widrig
Appellant/plaintiff
Shirley Mae Strazer
Respondent/executor
Lloyd W. Gardiner
Respondent/public Trustee/executor
The Public Trustee of the Province of Alberta
Respondent/executor (estate)
John W. D. Buchanan
Respondent/executor's Solicitor/defendant
Harold Komish
Defendant/contended Purchaser
B.C. Yukon Air Service Limited
Defendant/company
Procedural Posture
Action for Specific Performance and Damages Arising From Sale of Testator's Shares; Appeal / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause in will granted a right of first refusal to the other shareholder
- 2 Whether executors were bound to accept Komish's offer
- 3 Whether there was a binding contract to sell to Widrig
Ratio Decidendi
The will's clause did not grant an exclusive right of first refusal to Komish; the executors validly rejected Komish's non-cash final offer and lawfully contracted to sell to Widrig; the trial judge properly recalled his unentered specific performance judgment and substituted damages; the Court of Appeal erred in principle in reducing damages and the $40,000 award (except as to personal liability of certain executors) is restored.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; trial judgment restored except insofar as it awarded personal liability against certain respondents; cross-appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal allowed and trial judgment of Milvain J. restored except that damages and costs shall not be recovered from Shirley Mae Strazer and Lloyd W. Gardiner in their personal capacities
- Cross-appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment