Woo Estate v. Canada (Attorney General)
- Citation
- 2001 FCT 1277
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- Federal Court
- Decision
- 21 November 2001
- Posture
- Interlocutory Motion / Pre Trial Procedural Motion
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Federal Court
- Decision
- 21 November 2001
- Posture
- Interlocutory Motion / Pre Trial Procedural Motion
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Court exercised its discretion to allow the change of respondent to the Attorney General of Canada, permitted the applicants to serve and file a supplementary affidavit and the applicants' record within short fixed deadlines, and allowed the respondent to serve and file supplementary affidavits within a specified period while declaring that applicants are foreclosed from filing further affidavits absent special circumstances.
Court disposition
Motion allowed in part
Orders
- The application to change the name of the respondent to read Attorney General of Canada is allowed.
- The application to file a supplementary affidavit by the applicant is allowed; the supplementary affidavit must be served and filed within two days of today's date.
- The applicant may file her Application Record within two days of today's date.
- The respondent may serve and file supplementary affidavits within a delay of 20 days of today's date.
- The applicant shall not be permitted to file any further affidavits unless for very special reasons shown to the Court.
- ORDER (formal): The Minister of Veterans Affairs be replaced by the Attorney General of Canada as respondent in the style of cause.
- ORDER (formal): The applicants are allowed to serve and file a supplementary affidavit pursuant to Rule 312 of the Federal Court Rules; the respondent will have 30 days to serve and file supplementary affidavits.
- ORDER (formal): The applicants are allowed to serve and file the applicants' record pursuant to Rule 309 of the Federal Court Rules on this day.
- ORDER (formal): The applicants will be foreclosed to file further material in the present case and to ask for leave to file the same under Rule 312 unless special circumstances can be shown to the Court.
02
Material facts
Parties
THE ESTATE OF YUAN VERCINGETORIX WOO (AKA JEAN-PAUL MARTINEAU)
ApplicantGRACE LI XIU WOO
ApplicantTHE MINISTER OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, CANADA
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Supplementary Affidavit Filing Deadline (days): 2
- Respondent Supplementary Affidavits Deadline (days) Paragraph Order: 20
- Respondent Supplementary Affidavits Deadline (days) Formal Order: 30
03
Procedural history
Posture
Interlocutory Motion / Pre Trial Procedural Motion
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the style of cause should be changed to name the Attorney General of Canada as respondent
- 02
Whether the applicants may file a supplementary affidavit pursuant to Rule 312
- 03
Whether the respondent should be permitted to file supplementary affidavits and whether delays under Rules 307 and following should restart
- 04
Whether applicants should be foreclosed from filing further affidavits absent special reasons
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant moved to change the style of cause and for leave to file a supplementary affidavit and sought to file the Application Record immediately; opposed respondent's request to restart delays and sought no extra delay and to file before seeing respondent's supplementary affidavits.
- Respondent
- Respondent consented to change of style and to the applicant filing a supplementary affidavit but requested leave to file supplementary affidavits and that the delays prescribed in Rules 307 and following be restarted from the date of the Court's order.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Federal Court Rules
Court has discretion to amend style of cause and control pleadings and affidavits in interlocutory proceedings
- 02
Federal Court Rules (Rule 312)
Rule 312 permits service and filing of supplementary affidavits with leave
- 03
Federal Court Rules (Rules 307, 309)
Rules 307 and 309 govern timelines for serving and filing the record and related materials
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Court exercised its discretion to allow the change of respondent to the Attorney General of Canada, permitted the applicants to serve and file a supplementary affidavit and the applicants' record within short fixed deadlines, and allowed the respondent to serve and file supplementary affidavits within a specified period while declaring that applicants are foreclosed from filing further affidavits absent special circumstances.
Obiter and limits
- Court advised applicant not to object to restarting of delays as it may permit her to see respondent's supplementary affidavits and would not necessarily foreclose a reply
- Applicant was warned that further affidavits will be permitted only for very special reasons
Court disposition
Motion allowed in part
- The application to change the name of the respondent to read Attorney General of Canada is allowed.
- The application to file a supplementary affidavit by the applicant is allowed; the supplementary affidavit must be served and filed within two days of today's date.
- The applicant may file her Application Record within two days of today's date.
- The respondent may serve and file supplementary affidavits within a delay of 20 days of today's date.
- The applicant shall not be permitted to file any further affidavits unless for very special reasons shown to the Court.
- ORDER (formal): The Minister of Veterans Affairs be replaced by the Attorney General of Canada as respondent in the style of cause.
- ORDER (formal): The applicants are allowed to serve and file a supplementary affidavit pursuant to Rule 312 of the Federal Court Rules; the respondent will have 30 days to serve and file supplementary affidavits.
- ORDER (formal): The applicants are allowed to serve and file the applicants' record pursuant to Rule 309 of the Federal Court Rules on this day.
- ORDER (formal): The applicants will be foreclosed to file further material in the present case and to ask for leave to file the same under Rule 312 unless special circumstances can be shown to the Court.
Source and reliance status
Federal Court · 21 November 2001
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Federal Court
Judgment· 21 November 2001
Woo Estate v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-11-21 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 1277 File numbers T-1688-01 Decision Content Date: 20011121 Docket: T-1688-01 Neutral citation: 2001 FCT OTTAWA, ONTARIO, WEDNESDAY, THIS 21st DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2001 BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE TEITELBAUM BETWEEN:
THE ESTATE OF YUAN VERCINGETORIX WOO (AKA JEAN-PAUL MARTINEAU) Applicant AND:
GRACE LI XIU WOO Applicant AND: THE MINISTER OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, CANADA Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] The applicant, on November 6, 2001, filed into the Federal Court Registry a Notice of Motion to have the style of cause changed to identify the respondent as the Attorney General of Canada and for permission to file a supplementary affidavit. [2] The respondent consented to the said Notice of Motion but requested that the Court allow the respondent the opportunity to file supplementary affidavits. [3] The applicant agreed that the respondent be permitted to file supplementary affidavits. [4] The respondent also requested that the Court order that the delays prescribed in Rules 307 and following to restart running from the date of my Order. [5] The applicant objected as she was of the belief that to allow this request of the respondent would unduly delay the proceedings. [6] The applicant wanted permission to file her Application Record immediately and, of course, before she would see the respondent's supplementary affidavits. [7] I allowed the applicant's request to file her Application Record and informed her that she should not object to the request of the respondent that the delays prescribed in Rules 307 and following to restart running from the date of my Order as this may enable her to see what supplementary affidavits are filed by the respondent and it would not necessarily foreclose her from being able to reply to the supplementary affidavits of the respondent. [8] The applicant insisted that no extra delays be granted and that she was not concerned about what the respondent's supplementary affidavits may contain.
O R D E R [9] The application to change the nae of the respondent to read Attorney General of Canada is allowed. [10] The application to file a supplementary affidavit by the applicant is allowed. The said supplementary affidavit must be served and filed into the Court Record within two days of today's date. [11] The applicant may file her Application Record within two days of today's date. [12] The respondent may serve and file supplementary affidavits within a delay of 20 days of today's date. [13] The applicant shall not be permitted to file any further affidavits unless for very special reasons shown to the Court. "Max M. Teitelbaum" J.F.C.C. Considering the applicants' motion to change the style of cause and for leave to file a supplementary affidavit, and upon representations of the parties, the Court: ORDERS that the Minister of Veterans Affairs be replaced by the Attorney General of Canada as respondent in the style of cause; ALLOWS the applicants to serve and file a supplementary affidavit pursuant to Rule 312 of the Federal Court Rules. The respondent will have 30 days to serve and file supplementary affidavits; ALLOWS the applicants to serve and file the applicants' record pursuant to Rule 309 of the Federal Court Rules on this day; DECLARES that the applicants will be foreclosed to file further material in the present case and to ask for a leave to file the same under Rule 312 of the Federal Court Rules unless special circumstances can be shown to the Court that would permit the applicants to file same. "Max M. Teitelbaum" J.F.C.C.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.