MB6-07044
The RAD confirmed the RPD decision because the appellant's substantial unexplained delay in claiming refugee protection and lack of corroborative evidence undermined the credibility of his asserted sexual orientation and his subjective fear of persecution, which fatally defeated his refugee claim.
- Citation
- MB6-07044
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal (rad) / Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD determination confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Credibility Assessment, Delay in Claiming Refugee Protection, Sexual Orientation (sogie), Convention Refugee Status, Person in Need of Protection
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal (rad) / Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the RPD erred in its credibility assessment of the appellant's sexual orientation
- 2 Whether the appellant's delay in claiming refugee protection undermines his subjective fear
- 3 Whether corroborative evidence was required to establish sexual orientation and fear
Ratio Decidendi
The RAD confirmed the RPD decision because the appellant's substantial unexplained delay in claiming refugee protection and lack of corroborative evidence undermined the credibility of his asserted sexual orientation and his subjective fear of persecution, which fatally defeated his refugee claim.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD determination confirmed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; RAD confirms RPD that appellant is not a Convention refugee under section 96 of the IRPA nor a person in need of protection within section 97 of the IRPA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment