MC1-03725
The appeal is dismissed because the RPD reasonably relied on material contradictions, omissions and unreliable documentary evidence to find the appellant not credible; on the balance of probabilities the appellant failed to prove he was a UFDG activist, that he was subject to police problems arising from...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- MC1-03725
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Appeal / Reasons and Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Credibility Assessment, Convention Refugee Status, Person in Need of Protection, Political Opinion, Membership and Persecution, Documentary Evidence Weight
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal / Reasons and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is a Convention refugee
- 2 Whether the appellant is a person in need of protection
- 3 Whether the RPD erred in its credibility assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the RPD reasonably relied on material contradictions, omissions and unreliable documentary evidence to find the appellant not credible; on the balance of probabilities the appellant failed to prove he was a UFDG activist, that he was subject to police problems arising from demonstrations, or that he faces a real risk of persecution or serious harm if returned to Guinea.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- RPD decision confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment