TB8-17614
The RPD's credibility findings were correct and determinative: two support letters were implausibly identical and therefore given no weight, the claimant's inconsistent explanations for not leaving Pakistan and his voluntary returns undermined subjective fear and the existence of an agent of harm, and there was no denial of procedural fairness; accordingly the Appellants are neither Convention Refugees nor persons in need of protection.
- Citation
- TB8-17614
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal / Decision on Appeal (written)
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Credibility, Procedural Fairness, Internal Flight Alternative, Convention Refugee Test, Risk of Persecution, Residual Risk
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal / Decision on Appeal (written)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the RPD erred in its credibility findings
- 2 Whether procedural fairness/natural justice was denied
- 3 Whether documentary evidence was probative or implausible
Ratio Decidendi
The RPD's credibility findings were correct and determinative: two support letters were implausibly identical and therefore given no weight, the claimant's inconsistent explanations for not leaving Pakistan and his voluntary returns undermined subjective fear and the existence of an agent of harm, and there was no denial of procedural fairness; accordingly the Appellants are neither Convention Refugees nor persons in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
Orders
- Appeals dismissed
- Refugee Protection Division decision of July 9, 2018 confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment