MB3-02392
The RAD dismissed the appeal and confirmed the RPD decision because the RPD reasonably found the appellant not credible based on omissions, inconsistencies and implausible conduct; the documentary evidence submitted on appeal was inadmissible under s110(4) because the appellant failed to show it was new or not reasonably available; given the credibility finding, no internal flight alternative analysis or hearing under s110(6) could alter the outcome.
- Citation
- MB3-02392
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Appeal / Appeal Decision (refugee Appeal Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD determination confirmed; appellant not a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection
- Legal Topics
- Credibility Assessment, Internal Flight Alternative, Admissibility of Evidence, Standard of Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal / Appeal Decision (refugee Appeal Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 whether RPD erred in credibility assessment
- 2 admissibility under s110(4) of new evidence presented on appeal
- 3 whether a hearing should be held under s110(6)
Ratio Decidendi
The RAD dismissed the appeal and confirmed the RPD decision because the RPD reasonably found the appellant not credible based on omissions, inconsistencies and implausible conduct; the documentary evidence submitted on appeal was inadmissible under s110(4) because the appellant failed to show it was new or not reasonably available; given the credibility finding, no internal flight alternative analysis or hearing under s110(6) could alter the outcome.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD determination confirmed; appellant not a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- RPD decision dated June 21, 2013 confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment