MB4-03314
The RAD independently reviewed the record, concluded the RPD's adverse credibility findings were justified on account of inconsistencies and lack of detail, found no new evidence meeting s110(4) to warrant an oral hearing under s110(6), and therefore confirmed the RPD's decision that the appellant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
- Citation
- MB4-03314
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXX XXXX; Minister/respondent: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (Canada)
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Appeal / Appeal Before Refugee Appeal Division (decision)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Credibility Assessment, Oral Hearing Under S110(6), Ministerial Intervention, Standard of Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Appellant
Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (Canada)
Minister/respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal / Appeal Before Refugee Appeal Division (decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 whether the RPD's adverse credibility findings were reasonable
- 2 whether the appellant satisfied requirements for an oral hearing under s110(6) of IRPA
- 3 whether the appellant is a Convention refugee under s96 of IRPA
Ratio Decidendi
The RAD independently reviewed the record, concluded the RPD's adverse credibility findings were justified on account of inconsistencies and lack of detail, found no new evidence meeting s110(4) to warrant an oral hearing under s110(6), and therefore confirmed the RPD's decision that the appellant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- RPD decision dated July 29, 2014 is confirmed pursuant to IRPA s111(1)(a)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment