VB8-06991
The RAD confirmed the RPD's credibility findings as supported by the record; because the Appellant's testimony contained material inconsistencies and omissions (notably concerning the 2012 trip, the airport shooting, and family details), he failed to prove on a balance of probabilities a well‑founded fear of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- VB8-06991
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal Under IRPA / Appeal to Refugee Appeal Division After RPD Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Refugee Protection, Credibility Assessment, Persecution, Convention Refugee Status, Risk of Torture
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Appellant
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal Under IRPA / Appeal to Refugee Appeal Division After RPD Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Appellant is credible on key facts
- 2 Whether the Appellant established a well‑founded fear of persecution
- 3 Whether the Appellant is a Convention refugee or person in need of protection
Ratio Decidendi
The RAD confirmed the RPD's credibility findings as supported by the record; because the Appellant's testimony contained material inconsistencies and omissions (notably concerning the 2012 trip, the airport shooting, and family details), he failed to prove on a balance of probabilities a well‑founded fear of persecution and thus is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
Orders
- Decision of the Refugee Protection Division dated November 1, 2018 confirmed pursuant to section 111(1)(a) of the IRPA; appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment