MB4-00639
The RAD confirmed the RPD because the RPD's adverse credibility finding was unchallenged and supported by the record and because the RPD correctly applied relevant country documentation and risk‑profile guidance to conclude the appellant, given his Indian Tamil profile and travel history, did not face a risk of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- MB4-00639
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister (Canada)
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal (rad) / Final Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal denied; RPD decision confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Credibility Assessment, Country Conditions, Standard of Review, Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Appellant
Minister (Canada)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal (rad) / Final Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate standard of review for the RAD when assessing RPD findings
- 2 Whether the RPD made a palpable and overriding error in credibility findings
- 3 Whether the RPD erred in assessing country conditions and the appellant's risk based on his Tamil/Indian Tamil profile
Ratio Decidendi
The RAD confirmed the RPD because the RPD's adverse credibility finding was unchallenged and supported by the record and because the RPD correctly applied relevant country documentation and risk‑profile guidance to conclude the appellant, given his Indian Tamil profile and travel history, did not face a risk of persecution or torture on return; no palpable and overriding error was shown.
Court Disposition
Appeal denied; RPD decision confirmed
Orders
- Appeal denied and RPD decision of January 8, 2014 confirmed; appellant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment