TB7-03158
The RAD confirmed the RPD decision and dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to establish a serious possibility of persecution either from her former employer or for practising Christianity in Liaoning, the credibility of her account was undermined by lack of corroboration and implausible explanations...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- TB7-03158
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Appeal (rad) / Appeal Decision (rad Confirmation/dismissal)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Credibility, Religious Persecution, Sur Place, Family Planning Policy, Corroboration, Country Conditions, Employer Persecution
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Appellant
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal (rad) / Appeal Decision (rad Confirmation/dismissal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Credibility of appellant's testimony and documentary evidence
- 2 Risk of persecution by former employer
- 3 Risk of persecution for practising Christianity in China
Ratio Decidendi
The RAD confirmed the RPD decision and dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to establish a serious possibility of persecution either from her former employer or for practising Christianity in Liaoning, the credibility of her account was undermined by lack of corroboration and implausible explanations including multiple prior returns to China, and the country evidence indicated no serious risk in her province.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed and RPD decision confirmed pursuant to subsection 111(1)(a) of the IRPA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment