TB7-03158

TB7-03158

The RAD confirmed the RPD decision and dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to establish a serious possibility of persecution either from her former employer or for practising Christianity in Liaoning, the credibility of her account was undermined by lack of corroboration and implausible explanations...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
TB7-03158
Parties
Appellant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister
Court
Refugee Appeal Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
30 June 2017
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal (rad) / Appeal Decision (rad Confirmation/dismissal)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
Legal Topics
Credibility, Religious Persecution, Sur Place, Family Planning Policy, Corroboration, Country Conditions, Employer Persecution
Source Language
english
Immigration Law Refugee Law Administrative Law Credibility Religious Persecution Sur Place Family Planning Policy Corroboration +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX

Appellant

Minister

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Appeal (rad) / Appeal Decision (rad Confirmation/dismissal)

  1. 1 Credibility of appellant's testimony and documentary evidence
  2. 2 Risk of persecution by former employer
  3. 3 Risk of persecution for practising Christianity in China

Ratio Decidendi

The RAD confirmed the RPD decision and dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to establish a serious possibility of persecution either from her former employer or for practising Christianity in Liaoning, the credibility of her account was undermined by lack of corroboration and implausible explanations including multiple prior returns to China, and the country evidence indicated no serious risk in her province.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed and RPD decision confirmed pursuant to subsection 111(1)(a) of the IRPA