TB6-14913

TB6-14913

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to file the Appellant's Record within the 30‑day perfection period prescribed by IRPR s.159.91(1)(b), and did not request an extension of time as required by RAD Rule 3; therefore the Division dismissed the appeal for lack of perfection.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
TB6-14913
Parties
Appellant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Court
Refugee Appeal Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal (refugee Appeal Division) / Dismissal for Lack of Perfection (preparation/perfection Stage)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for lack of perfection
Legal Topics
Perfection of Appeal, Time Limits, Dismissal for Non Compliance, Receipt of Written Reasons
Source Language
en
Immigration Law Refugee Law Administrative Law Procedural Law Perfection of Appeal Time Limits Dismissal for Non Compliance Receipt of Written Reasons

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX

Appellant

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Appeal (refugee Appeal Division) / Dismissal for Lack of Perfection (preparation/perfection Stage)

  1. 1 Whether the appellant perfected the appeal within the regulatory time limit to perfect an appeal
  2. 2 Whether an extension of time to perfect the appeal was requested and granted
  3. 3 Consequences of failure to perfect an appeal under the Regulations and RAD rules

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to file the Appellant's Record within the 30‑day perfection period prescribed by IRPR s.159.91(1)(b), and did not request an extension of time as required by RAD Rule 3; therefore the Division dismissed the appeal for lack of perfection.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for lack of perfection

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for lack of perfection.