VB6-03967

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Refugee Appeal Division Commission de l'immigration et du statut de réfugié du Canada Section d'appel des réfugiés RAD File No. / N° de dossier de la SAR : VB6-03967 Private Proceeding / Huis clos Reasons and decision ? Motifs et décision Person(s) who is (are) XXXX XXXX Personne(s) en cause the subject of the appeal Appeal considered at Appel instruit à Date of decision November 24, 2016 Date de la décision Panel Douglas Fortney Tribunal Counsel for the person(s) who is (are) N/A Conseil(s) du (de la/des) the subject of the appeal personne(s) en cause Designated representative N/A Représentant(e) désigné(e) Counsel for the Minister Mandeep S. Randahawa Conseil du ministre REASONS FOR DECISION [1] The Refugee Appeal Division (the "RAD") received on November 8, 2016, a Notice of Appeal from the decision of the Refugee Protection Division (the "RPD") in the claim XXXX XXXX (the "appellant"). The appellant is a national of Rwanda. [2] According to RAD records, the appellant is appealing the Notice of Decision of the RPD dated October 7, 2016. [3] The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the appeal is in respect of a decision by the RPD for which no appeal may be made under paragraph 110(2)(d) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (the "Act").1 This subsection states the following: 110(2) Restriction on appeals - No appeal may be made in respect of any of the following: (d) subject to the regulations, a decision of the Refugee Protection Division in respect of a claim for refugee protection if (i) the foreign national who makes the claim came directly or indirectly to Canada from a country that is, on the day on which their claim is made, designated by regulations made under subsection 102(1) and that is a party to an agreement referred to in paragraph 102(2)(d), and (ii) the claim - by virtue of regulations made under paragraph 102(1)(c) - is not ineligible under paragraph 101(1)(e) to be referred to the Refugee Protection Division; [4] The only country that is designated by regulation and party to an agreement under paragraph 102(2)(d) of the Act is the United States. The appellant in this case came directly from the United States but was nonetheless eligible to make a claim by virtue of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations.2 Therefore, under paragraph 110(2)(d) of the Act, no appeal may be made in respect of the RPD's decision. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. (signed) "Douglas Fortney" Douglas Fortney November 24, 2016 Date 1 Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27. 2 Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002 - 227. --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ RAD File No. / N° de dossier de la SAR : VB6-03967