VB9-05657

VB9-05657

The panel confirmed the RPD's exclusion under Article 1F(b): the appellant committed a serious non-political crime (a D felony involving striking a pedestrian causing serious injury and fleeing the scene) and aggravating factors including prosecution as a felony, actual bodily harm, licence suspension and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
VB9-05657
Parties
Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Intervenor: Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Court
Refugee Appeal Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 August 2020
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal Under Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Decision of Refugee Appeal Division on Article 1 F(b) Exclusion
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; RPD determination confirmed; appellant excluded under Article 1F(b) and is not a Convention refugee or person in need of protection
Legal Topics
Article 1 F(b) Exclusion, Convention Refugee, Serious Non Political Crime, Credibility Assessment, Mode of Prosecution, Sentencing and Mitigation
Source Language
english
Immigration Law Refugee Law International Law Article 1 F(b) Exclusion Convention Refugee Serious Non Political Crime Credibility Assessment Mode of Prosecution +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX

Appellant

Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness

Intervenor

Procedural Posture

Refugee Appeal Under Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Decision of Refugee Appeal Division on Article 1 F(b) Exclusion

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is excluded from the definition of Convention refugee under Article 1F(b) of the 1951 Refugee Convention
  2. 2 Whether the crime committed by the appellant qualifies as a serious non-political crime
  3. 3 Whether the RPD erred in treating mode of prosecution, licence suspension and other factors as aggravating

Ratio Decidendi

The panel confirmed the RPD's exclusion under Article 1F(b): the appellant committed a serious non-political crime (a D felony involving striking a pedestrian causing serious injury and fleeing the scene) and aggravating factors including prosecution as a felony, actual bodily harm, licence suspension and credibility-damaging evidence (weapon possession) outweigh mitigating factors (lower range sentencing, youth), thus exclusion applies and the appellant is not a Convention refugee or person in need of protection.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; RPD determination confirmed; appellant excluded under Article 1F(b) and is not a Convention refugee or person in need of protection

Orders

  • Confirm RPD determination excluding appellant under Article 1F(b) of the 1951 Refugee Convention
  • Dismiss the appeal