VB9-05657
The panel confirmed the RPD's exclusion under Article 1F(b): the appellant committed a serious non-political crime (a D felony involving striking a pedestrian causing serious injury and fleeing the scene) and aggravating factors including prosecution as a felony, actual bodily harm, licence suspension and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- VB9-05657
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Intervenor: Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal Under Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Decision of Refugee Appeal Division on Article 1 F(b) Exclusion
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD determination confirmed; appellant excluded under Article 1F(b) and is not a Convention refugee or person in need of protection
- Legal Topics
- Article 1 F(b) Exclusion, Convention Refugee, Serious Non Political Crime, Credibility Assessment, Mode of Prosecution, Sentencing and Mitigation
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Appellant
Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal Under Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Decision of Refugee Appeal Division on Article 1 F(b) Exclusion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is excluded from the definition of Convention refugee under Article 1F(b) of the 1951 Refugee Convention
- 2 Whether the crime committed by the appellant qualifies as a serious non-political crime
- 3 Whether the RPD erred in treating mode of prosecution, licence suspension and other factors as aggravating
Ratio Decidendi
The panel confirmed the RPD's exclusion under Article 1F(b): the appellant committed a serious non-political crime (a D felony involving striking a pedestrian causing serious injury and fleeing the scene) and aggravating factors including prosecution as a felony, actual bodily harm, licence suspension and credibility-damaging evidence (weapon possession) outweigh mitigating factors (lower range sentencing, youth), thus exclusion applies and the appellant is not a Convention refugee or person in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD determination confirmed; appellant excluded under Article 1F(b) and is not a Convention refugee or person in need of protection
Orders
- Confirm RPD determination excluding appellant under Article 1F(b) of the 1951 Refugee Convention
- Dismiss the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment