MB9-01963
The RAD confirmed the RPD's negative credibility findings and held that the documentary evidence did not overcome contradictions, significant omissions, and inconsistent conduct; therefore the appellants failed to establish they are Convention refugees or persons in need of protection and the appeal is dismissed...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- MB9-01963
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Appellant: XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Appeal / Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD determination confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Credibility, Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection, Gender Based Persecution, Documentary Evidence, Risk Assessment
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Appellant
XXXX XXXX
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal / Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the RPD failed to consider and analyze documentary evidence
- 2 Whether the appellants were credible given contradictions and omissions
- 3 Whether appellants' conduct was inconsistent with a well-founded fear
Ratio Decidendi
The RAD confirmed the RPD's negative credibility findings and held that the documentary evidence did not overcome contradictions, significant omissions, and inconsistent conduct; therefore the appellants failed to establish they are Convention refugees or persons in need of protection and the appeal is dismissed under s.111(1)(a) IRPA.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD determination confirmed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The determination of the Refugee Protection Division is confirmed pursuant to paragraph 111(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment