TB4-09585

TB4-09585

The RAD dismissed the appeal because section 167 of the Economic Action Plan 2013 Act removes the right to appeal RPD decisions to the RAD for claims referred between August 14, 2012 and December 15, 2012, and that provision was in force as of June 26, 2013, therefore the RPD decision was not appealable.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
TB4-09585
Parties
Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX (a.k.a. XXXX XXXX); Respondent: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Court
Refugee Appeal Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
9 October 2014
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal / Decision on Jurisdiction and Dismissal
Outcome
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Appealability, Statutory Interpretation
Source Language
en
Immigration Refugee Law Administrative Law Jurisdiction Appealability Statutory Interpretation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX (a.k.a. XXXX XXXX)

Appellant

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Appeal / Decision on Jurisdiction and Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether the Refugee Appeal Division had jurisdiction to hear an appeal under section 167 of the Economic Action Plan 2013 Act
  2. 2 Whether an RPD decision respecting a claim referred after August 14, 2012 but before December 15, 2012 is appealable to the RAD
  3. 3 Effect of the coming into force date (June 26, 2013) of section 167 on appealability

Ratio Decidendi

The RAD dismissed the appeal because section 167 of the Economic Action Plan 2013 Act removes the right to appeal RPD decisions to the RAD for claims referred between August 14, 2012 and December 15, 2012, and that provision was in force as of June 26, 2013, therefore the RPD decision was not appealable.

Court Disposition

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.