MB3-04443
RAD concluded RPD's factual and credibility findings were reasonable: appellant failed to adduce satisfactory evidence that he would be perceived as Banyamulenge and thus failed to establish a well‑founded risk; no new admissible evidence was presented on appeal; therefore the RPD determination that the appellant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection was confirmed.
- Citation
- MB3-04443
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Intervenor: Minister of Public Safety Canada
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Appeal / RAD Decision on Appeal (appeal Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Identity, Credibility Assessment, Risk Assessment, Internal Flight Alternative, Standard of Review, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Appellant
Minister of Public Safety Canada
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal / RAD Decision on Appeal (appeal Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant established identity as Banyamulenge
- 2 Whether RPD erred in credibility findings
- 3 Whether RPD properly assessed risk in the DRC
Ratio Decidendi
RAD concluded RPD's factual and credibility findings were reasonable: appellant failed to adduce satisfactory evidence that he would be perceived as Banyamulenge and thus failed to establish a well‑founded risk; no new admissible evidence was presented on appeal; therefore the RPD determination that the appellant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection was confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Refugee Protection Division decision of September 16, 2013 confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment