TB5-02278

TB5-02278

The RAD dismissed the appeal because s.110(2)(c) IRPA expressly precludes appeals from RPD decisions rejecting claims as having no credible basis or as manifestly unfounded, leaving the RAD without jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
TB5-02278
Parties
Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Court
Refugee Appeal Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
13 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal Under IRPA / Notice of Appeal Received; Decision on Appeal: Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Appealability, Manifestly Unfounded, Credible Basis
Source Language
en
Immigration Refugee Law Administrative Law Jurisdiction Appealability Manifestly Unfounded Credible Basis

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX

Appellant

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Appeal Under IRPA / Notice of Appeal Received; Decision on Appeal: Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the Refugee Appeal Division has jurisdiction to hear an appeal under s.110(2)(c) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act

Ratio Decidendi

The RAD dismissed the appeal because s.110(2)(c) IRPA expressly precludes appeals from RPD decisions rejecting claims as having no credible basis or as manifestly unfounded, leaving the RAD without jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed