TB5-10154

TB5-10154

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to perfect the appeal within the 30‑day statutory period following deemed receipt of written reasons and did not apply for an extension; therefore RAD lacked a perfected record to proceed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
TB5-10154
Parties
Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration; Decision Maker: Refugee Protection Division
Court
Refugee Appeal Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
12 November 2015
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal Under Immigration and Refugee Protection Act/regulations / Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Perfection (failure to Perfect Within Statutory Time)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for lack of perfection.
Legal Topics
Perfection of Appeal, Time Limits, Deemed Receipt
Source Language
en
Immigration Law Refugee Law Administrative Law Perfection of Appeal Time Limits Deemed Receipt

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX

Appellant

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

Respondent

Refugee Protection Division

Decision Maker

Procedural Posture

Refugee Appeal Under Immigration and Refugee Protection Act/regulations / Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Perfection (failure to Perfect Within Statutory Time)

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was perfected within the statutory time limit
  2. 2 Whether an extension of time to perfect the appeal was applied for and granted
  3. 3 Whether failure to perfect warrants dismissal of the appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to perfect the appeal within the 30‑day statutory period following deemed receipt of written reasons and did not apply for an extension; therefore RAD lacked a perfected record to proceed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for lack of perfection.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed for lack of perfection (failure to perfect the appeal by October 16, 2015)