MB6-00676

MB6-00676

The RAD dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because s.110(2)(b) IRPA expressly precludes appeals of RPD determinations rejecting claims as abandoned.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
MB6-00676
Parties
Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Court
Refugee Appeal Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
1 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal / Notice of Appeal Received by Rad; Jurisdictional Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Abandonment of Claim, Jurisdiction, Appealability Under IRPA S.110(2)(b)
Source Language
en
Immigration Law Refugee Law Administrative Law Abandonment of Claim Jurisdiction Appealability Under IRPA S.110(2)(b)

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX

Appellant

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Appeal / Notice of Appeal Received by Rad; Jurisdictional Decision

  1. 1 Whether the Refugee Appeal Division has jurisdiction to hear an appeal from an RPD determination rejecting a refugee protection claim as abandoned under s.110(2)(b) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The RAD dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because s.110(2)(b) IRPA expressly precludes appeals of RPD determinations rejecting claims as abandoned.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.