TB8-15134

TB8-15134

The appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the claim was referred on December 5, 2012, which falls within the transitional period (August 15–December 14, 2012), and the claim was undecided by June 26, 2013, thereby excluding RAD jurisdiction under the corrected statutory scheme.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
TB8-15134
Parties
Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Court
Refugee Appeal Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
3 July 2018
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal / RAD Decision on Jurisdiction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Appeal Rights, Transitional Provisions, Statutory Interpretation, Referral Dates
Source Language
en
Immigration Law Refugee Law Administrative Law Jurisdiction Appeal Rights Transitional Provisions Statutory Interpretation Referral Dates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX

Appellant

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Appeal / RAD Decision on Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the RAD has jurisdiction to hear the appeal given the referral date
  2. 2 Application of section 36 of the Balanced Refugee Reform Act and subsequent amendments
  3. 3 Effect of the PCISA drafting error and its correction on appeal rights

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the claim was referred on December 5, 2012, which falls within the transitional period (August 15–December 14, 2012), and the claim was undecided by June 26, 2013, thereby excluding RAD jurisdiction under the corrected statutory scheme.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.