VB4-02821

VB4-02821

The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because subsection 36(1) of the Balanced Refugee Reform Act precludes a right of appeal to the RAD given the relevant referral date of the claim.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
VB4-02821
Parties
Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Court
Refugee Appeal Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
1 October 2014
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal / Appeal to Refugee Appeal Division; Jurisdictional Dismissal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Appeal Rights, Transitional Provisions of Refugee Reform
Source Language
en
Immigration Refugee Law Administrative Law Jurisdiction Appeal Rights Transitional Provisions of Refugee Reform

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Refugee Appeal / Appeal to Refugee Appeal Division; Jurisdictional Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether the Refugee Appeal Division has jurisdiction to hear an appeal where subsection 36(1) of the Balanced Refugee Reform Act applies and given the date the claim was referred to the Refugee Protection Division

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because subsection 36(1) of the Balanced Refugee Reform Act precludes a right of appeal to the RAD given the relevant referral date of the claim.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.