TB5-02107

TB5-02107

The appeal was dismissed because the RPD decision rejected the claim on grounds that fall within s.110(2)(c) IRPA, which removes RAD jurisdiction to hear such appeals.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
TB5-02107
Parties
Appellant: XXXXX
Court
Refugee Appeal Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
4 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal / Final Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Appealability, Manifestly Unfounded, Credibility
Source Language
english
Immigration Law Refugee Law Administrative Law Jurisdiction Appealability Manifestly Unfounded Credibility

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXXX

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Refugee Appeal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the RAD has jurisdiction to hear an appeal under s.110(2)(c) IRPA
  2. 2 Whether the RPD decision was of the type from which an appeal may be made
  3. 3 Whether the RPD rejected the claim as having no credible basis or being manifestly unfounded

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the RPD decision rejected the claim on grounds that fall within s.110(2)(c) IRPA, which removes RAD jurisdiction to hear such appeals.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.