MB4-01122
The RAD confirmed the RPD because the RPD's adverse credibility findings and assessment of documentary evidence were supported by reasons (inconsistencies, embellishment, delays, lack of corroboration and a reasonable interpretation of country documentation regarding Mara recruitment patterns) and did not constitute...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- MB4-01122
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXXXXXXXXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal / Decision on Appeal (rad Confirmation of Rpd)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Credibility Assessment, Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection, Gang Recruitment Risk, Documentary Evidence, Standard of Intervention
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Appellant
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal / Decision on Appeal (rad Confirmation of Rpd)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the RPD erred in its credibility finding
- 2 Whether documentary evidence corroborates the appellant's claim of risk from MS-13 recruitment
- 3 Whether the appellant meets the definition of a Convention refugee or person in need of protection
Ratio Decidendi
The RAD confirmed the RPD because the RPD's adverse credibility findings and assessment of documentary evidence were supported by reasons (inconsistencies, embellishment, delays, lack of corroboration and a reasonable interpretation of country documentation regarding Mara recruitment patterns) and did not constitute palpable and overriding errors warranting intervention.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Decision of the Refugee Protection Division confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment