TB5-02006
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to perfect the appeal within the statutory 30‑day period following receipt of written reasons and did not apply for an extension of time, mandating dismissal under IRPR s.159.91(1)(b) and RAD Rule 3.
- Citation
- TB5-02006
- Parties
- Appellant: XXXXXXXXXXXXX
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal (refugee Appeal Division) / Dismissal for Lack of Perfection (preliminary Procedural Stage)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed for lack of perfection.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Perfection, Limitation Periods, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal (refugee Appeal Division) / Dismissal for Lack of Perfection (preliminary Procedural Stage)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal was perfected within the statutory time limit
- 2 Whether an extension of time to perfect the appeal was sought or should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to perfect the appeal within the statutory 30‑day period following receipt of written reasons and did not apply for an extension of time, mandating dismissal under IRPR s.159.91(1)(b) and RAD Rule 3.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed for lack of perfection.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed for lack of perfection.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment