YL v Canada Employment Insurance Commission
The claimant did not rebut the presumption that full-time students are unavailable for work and therefore failed to meet the Act's availability and capability requirements; additionally the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to decide write-off of overpayments under the Act.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2022 SST 465
- Parties
- Appellant: Y. L.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance Appeal / General Division Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Availability for Work, Full Time Student Presumption, Disentitlement, Overpayment Write Off, Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Y. L.
Appellant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance Appeal / General Division Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the claimant available for work while attending full-time studies?
- 2 Did the claimant rebut the presumption that full-time students are unavailable for work?
- 3 Does the Tribunal have jurisdiction to decide on the write-off of the overpayment?
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant did not rebut the presumption that full-time students are unavailable for work and therefore failed to meet the Act's availability and capability requirements; additionally the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to decide write-off of overpayments under the Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment