Canada Judgment

Federal Court

Yahey v. Ewaskow

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Court found the Respondents did not comply with the Blueberry River Custom Election By‑law when convening the challenged meetings (only the Chief may convene urgent meetings, quorum of four was not met, and the petition and Section 188 Report were not properly presented), such that the Applicants established a serious issue to be tried, would suffer irreparable harm from premature removal of officeholders, and the balance of convenience favoured maintaining the status quo; accordingly the Court granted interlocutory relief staying the resolutions and imposing restraints while ordering a properly convened council meeting within 30 days to address the petition and report in accordance with the Custom By‑law.

Court disposition

Interlocutory relief granted in part: resolutions stayed, restraints imposed, meeting ordered, costs awarded

Orders

  • Band Council Resolutions #2020-012 and #2020-013 stayed until final resolution of the Application on the merits
  • Respondents restrained, until final determination, from representing that Chief Marvin Yahey has been removed from office
  • Respondents restrained, until final determination, from acting on behalf of the Blueberry River First Nation beyond their capacity as Council Members or representing they have authority to do so, including convening special urgent Band Council meetings
  • Chief Marvin Yahey ordered to convene a Band Council meeting, or to instruct the Chief Operating Officer to convene it, within 30 days of the order and to place the band members’ petition and the Section 188 Report on the agenda to be dealt with in accordance with the Blueberry River Custom Election By-law
  • Both parties restrained from threatening or intimidating the band members who signed the petition during the verification process under Part 22 of the Custom Election By-law
  • The Court remains seized of the matter until the next Band Council meeting is held or the case is settled
  • Costs in the total amount of $3,000.00 payable forthwith by the Respondents to the Applicants

02

Material facts

Parties

Marvin Yahey

Applicant Counsel: Georges Rivard

Wayne Yahey

Applicant Counsel: Georges Rivard

Sherry Dominic

Applicant Counsel: Georges Rivard

Robin Ewaskow

Respondent Counsel: Mark Underhill

Troy Wolf

Respondent Counsel: Mark Underhill

Shelley Gauthier

Respondent Counsel: Mark Underhill

Amounts and remedies

  • Costs Awarded: CAD 3,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interim Injunction Hearing/order (interlocutory)

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants argued the June 10 and June 17 meetings and the resulting Band Council Resolutions were invalid because the Custom Election By-law was not followed: only the Chief may convene an urgent special meeting with 24‑hour notice, proper quorum (4 members) was not present, the petition and the Section 188 Report were not properly presented and petitioners were not present; removal of a Chief before term expiry causes irreparable harm and the balance of convenience favours maintaining the status quo pending final determination.
Respondent
Respondents relied on a Blueberry First Nations Governance Manual to justify convening and holding the meetings with three Council members and contended the petition allegedly signed by over 60% of band members and the Section 188 Report supported their actions; they took steps to replace Chief Yahey’s signing authority and to access band financial information.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    RJR‑MacDonald Inc. v Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 SCR 311

    Test for interlocutory injunction: serious issue to be tried, irreparable harm, balance of convenience

  2. 02

    Assiniboine v Meeches, 2013 FCA 114

    Removal of a Chief or councilor prior to expiration of term generally constitutes irreparable harm

  3. 03

    Lower Nicola First Nation v The Council, 2012 FC 103

    Uncertainty in a First Nation’s power structure causes irreparable harm to membership and third parties

  4. 04

    Blueberry River Custom Election By‑law (2017)

    A First Nation’s self‑adopted bylaws (Custom Election By‑law) govern procedures for convening meetings and removals and must be followed

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Court found the Respondents did not comply with the Blueberry River Custom Election By‑law when convening the challenged meetings (only the Chief may convene urgent meetings, quorum of four was not met, and the petition and Section 188 Report were not properly presented), such that the Applicants established a serious issue to be tried, would suffer irreparable harm from premature removal of officeholders, and the balance of convenience favoured maintaining the status quo; accordingly the Court granted interlocutory relief staying the resolutions and imposing restraints while ordering a properly convened council meeting within 30 days to address the petition and report in accordance with the Custom By‑law.

Obiter and limits

  • Serious allegations and an ongoing police investigation against the Chief and the Director of Operations were noted but did not justify bypassing the Custom Election By‑law
  • The Respondents did not demonstrate that the Blueberry First Nations Governance Manual had been validly adopted or that it supplanted the Custom Code
  • The Court emphasized the imperative of regular council meetings and certainty for third parties who interact with the First Nation
  • The Court remains seized of the matter until the ordered meeting occurs or the case is otherwise settled

Court disposition

Interlocutory relief granted in part: resolutions stayed, restraints imposed, meeting ordered, costs awarded

  • Band Council Resolutions #2020-012 and #2020-013 stayed until final resolution of the Application on the merits
  • Respondents restrained, until final determination, from representing that Chief Marvin Yahey has been removed from office
  • Respondents restrained, until final determination, from acting on behalf of the Blueberry River First Nation beyond their capacity as Council Members or representing they have authority to do so, including convening special urgent Band Council meetings
  • Chief Marvin Yahey ordered to convene a Band Council meeting, or to instruct the Chief Operating Officer to convene it, within 30 days of the order and to place the band members’ petition and the Section 188 Report on the agenda to be dealt with in accordance with the Blueberry River Custom Election By-law
  • Both parties restrained from threatening or intimidating the band members who signed the petition during the verification process under Part 22 of the Custom Election By-law
  • The Court remains seized of the matter until the next Band Council meeting is held or the case is settled
  • Costs in the total amount of $3,000.00 payable forthwith by the Respondents to the Applicants

Source and reliance status

Federal Court · 29 June 2020

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Federal Court

Judgment· 29 June 2020

2020 FC 732

Yahey v. Ewaskow Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2020-06-29 Neutral citation 2020 FC 732 File numbers T-648-20 Decision Content Date: 20200629 Docket: T-648-20 Citation: 2020 FC 732 Ottawa, Ontario, June 29, 2020 PRESENT: The Associate Chief Justice Gagné BETWEEN: MARVIN YAHEY, WAYNE YAHEY AND SHERRY DOMINIC Applicants And ROBIN EWASKOW, TROY WOLF AND SHELLEY GAUTHIER Respondents

ORDER AND REASONS [1] UPON Motion by the Applicants pursuant to Rule 373(1) of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR 98-106, for: An interlocutory injunction staying Blueberry River First Nation [BRFN] Band Council Resolutions #2020-012 and #2020-013 until the final determination of this Application on the merits; An interlocutory injunction restraining the Respondents, until a final determination of this Application on the merits, from making representations that Chief Marvin Yahey has been removed from office; An interlocutory injunction restraining the Respondents, until a final determination of this Application on the merits, from acting on behalf of the BRFN, or representing that they have the authority to do so, including, inter alia, the convening of Council meetings and sending communications on the letterhead of BRFN; Costs, including special costs; and e. Such further or other relief as to this Court deems just. [2] AND UPON considering that Band Council Resolution #2020-012 purports to remove Chief Marvin Yahey from office, whereas Band Council Resolution #2020-013 instructs BRFN’s bank to provide them with the band’s financial statements and replaces Chief Yahey’s signing authority with that of Respondent Robin Ewaskow, as well as suspends BRFN’s Director of Operations; [3] AND UPON considering that in order to be successful, the Applicants had to demonstrate that their

Application raises a serious issue to be tried, that they will suffer irreparable harm if an injunction is not granted, and that the balance of convenience favours granting the injunction (RJR-MacDonald Inc. v Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 SCR 311); [4] AND UPON finding that the Respondents failed to abide by the Blueberry River Custom Election By-law [Custom Code], duly adopted in 2017, when they convened and held the June 10th and June 17th meetings where both resolutions were adopted, specifically because: Only the Chief can convene a special urgent meeting with a 24-hour notice; The proper quorum of 4 Council members were not present at the meeting (and the Respondents have not demonstrated that the Blueberry First Nations Governance Manual, which they relied on to hold the meeting with only 3 Council members, has been properly adopted or that it has not been superseded or replaced by the Custom Code); and The petition by more than 60% of band members and the Section 188 Report were not properly presented and the petitioners were not present, in person or by teleconference/videoconference, at the meeting; [5] AND UPON finding that the Applicants and the First Nation as a whole will suffer irreparable harm if an injunction is not granted, as “each member of the First Nation will suffer by having such conflict and uncertainty in their power structure, particularly, the

tension and uncertainty as to who holds office” (Lower Nicola First Nation v The Council, 2012 FC 103, at para 35). I agree with the Applicants that the removal of a Chief or Council members from office prior to the expiration of their normal term of office generally constitutes irreparable harm (Assiniboine v Meeches, 2013 FCA 114, at para 23), especially when the rules the First Nation has adopted for itself and chosen to abide by have not been followed; [6] AND UPON finding last, and subject to what follows, that the balance of convenience favours maintaining the status quo as that is in the best interests of the BRFN who, along with third parties who interact with it, need certainty and predictability in their governance; [7] AND UPON considering, however, that serious allegations were made against Chief Marvin Yahey both by members of the BRFN in a petition allegedly signed by more than 60% of the First Nation and in a Section 188 Report against Chief Marvin Yahey, as well as through an ongoing police investigation concerning certain misconduct by the Chief and by the BRFN’s Director of Operations; [8] AND UPON considering that the Court was informed that since April 2020, the Band Council has failed to conform to its Custom Code by holding two regular meetings a month; [9] AND UPON finding that in these circumstances, it is imperative that a regular meeting of the Band

Council be held within 30 days of the present order; that all 6 members of the Band Council be ordered to attend, and that the petition and Section 188 Report be properly put on this meeting’s agenda; ORDER in T-648-20 THIS COURT ORDERS that: Band Council Resolutions #2020-012 and #2020-013 are stayed until the final resolution of this Application on its merits; Until a final determination of this Application on its merits, the Respondents are restrained from making representations that Chief Marvin Yahey has been removed from office; Until a final determination of this Application on its merits, the Respondents are restrained from acting on behalf of the BRFN in any other capacity than Council Members, or representing that they have the authority to do so, including, inter alia, the convening of special urgent Band Council meetings; Chief Marvin Yahey is ordered to convene a meeting of the Band Council, or to instruct the Chief Operating Officer to convene a meeting, to be held within 30 days of the present order, and to put on the agenda of that meeting the band members’ petition and Section 188 Report to be duly dealt with in accordance with the Blueberry River Custom Election By-law; Both parties are restrained from threatening or intimidating the band members who signed the petition during the verification process provided for in Part 22 of the Blueberry River Custom Election By-law; The undersigned remains seized of the matter until the next meeting of the Band Council is held and/or until this case is settled through mediation or otherwise, which ever comes first; Costs in the total amount of $3,000.00 are payable forthwith by the Respondents to the Applicants. “Jocelyne Gagné” Associate Chief Justice

FEDERAL COURT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-648-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MARVIN YAHEY, WAYNE YAHEY AND, SHERRY DOMINIC v ROBIN EWASKOW, TROY WOLF AND, SHELLEY GAUTHIER PLACE OF HEARING: HELD BY VIDEOCONFERENCE BETWEEN Vancouver, British Columbia AND OTTAWA, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: June 26, 2020 ORDER AND REASONS: GAGNÉ A.C.J. DATED: JUNE 29, 2020 APPEARANCES: Georges Rivard For The Applicants Mark Underhill For The Respondents SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Arvay Finlay LLP Vancouver, British Columbia For The Applicants Rivard Law Fort St. John, British Columbia For The Respondents

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

RJR-MacDonald Inc. v Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 SCR 311

Case cited

Lower Nicola First Nation v The Council, 2012 FC 103

Case cited

Assiniboine v Meeches, 2013 FCA 114

Case cited

Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106, Rule 373(1)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Blueberry River Custom Election By-law (2017)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Blueberry First Nations Governance Manual

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Indian Act, RSC 1985, c I-5, s.188

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.