Giroux v. R.

Giroux v. R.

The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to establish that the trial judge committed any error in relation to the first competition and failed to prove that false statements were made in the second competition; the appellate court found no manifest or overriding error and the evidence did not establish...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2002 FCA 319
Parties
Appellant: Yvon Giroux; Respondent: Her Majesty in Right of Canada
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
11 September 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Appellate Standard of Review, False Statements Vs Misinformation, Costs
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Public Employment Law Evidence Judicial Review Appellate Standard of Review False Statements Vs Misinformation Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yvon Giroux

Appellant

Her Majesty in Right of Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in the review of the first competition
  2. 2 Whether false statements were established in the second competition
  3. 3 Whether misinformation equates to a false statement warranting intervention

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to establish that the trial judge committed any error in relation to the first competition and failed to prove that false statements were made in the second competition; the appellate court found no manifest or overriding error and the evidence did not establish the alleged faults.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.