AB Jnr & Mme B v MB & Ors - Costs [2013] CIFsd 18 (16 June 2013)

AB Jnr & Mme B v MB & Ors - Costs [2013] CIFsd 18 (16 June 2013)

The court held that the applicants, having succeeded in the substantive matter, are entitled to their costs, subject to assessment if not agreed.

Citation
[2013] CIFsd 18
Parties
Applicant: AB Jnr; Applicant: Mme B; Respondent: MB; Respondent: Ors
Jurisdiction
Cayman Islands
Judgment Date
16 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Costs Determination / Post Judgment
Outcome
costs awarded to applicants
Legal Topics
Costs, Allocation of Costs
Civil Procedure Costs Allocation of Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AB Jnr

Applicant

Mme B

Applicant

MB

Respondent

Ors

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Costs Determination / Post Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Entitlement to costs following substantive judgment
  2. 2 Appropriate allocation of costs between parties

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the applicants, having succeeded in the substantive matter, are entitled to their costs, subject to assessment if not agreed.

Court Disposition

costs awarded to applicants

Orders

  • Applicants awarded costs of the proceedings, to be assessed if not agreed