In the matter of Perry v Lopag [2023] CIFsd 12 (23 February 2023)
The court held that while trustees have a duty of confidentiality, this duty is not absolute and may be overridden where disclosure is necessary for the fair determination of proceedings involving beneficiaries.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] CIFsd 12
- Parties
- Applicant: Perry; Respondent: Lopag
- Jurisdiction
- Cayman Islands
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Confidentiality, Disclosure of Trust Documents
Trust Law Confidentiality Trustee Confidentiality Disclosure of Trust Documents
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Perry
Applicant
Lopag
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees are entitled to maintain confidentiality over trust documents in the context of proceedings involving beneficiaries
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that while trustees have a duty of confidentiality, this duty is not absolute and may be overridden where disclosure is necessary for the fair determination of proceedings involving beneficiaries.
Court Disposition
application granted in part
Orders
- Trustees required to disclose specified trust documents subject to confidentiality protections
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment