The Royal Mint Ltd v The Commonwealth Mint And Philatelic Bureau Ltd
The term 'SOVEREIGN' is a denomination and kind of gold commemorative coin, commonly used in the trade and by consumers to describe such coins, including those not produced by the Royal Mint. The evidence did not establish that a significant proportion of the relevant public perceived 'SOVEREIGN' alone as indicating origin from the Royal Mint. Therefore, the mark is excluded from registration under sections 3(1)(c) and (d) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, and has not acquired distinctiveness.
- Parties
- Appellant (applicant): The Royal Mint Limited; Respondent (opponent): The Commonwealth Mint and Philatelic Bureau Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Trade Mark Appeal / Appeal From Trade Marks Registry Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Absolute Grounds for Refusal, Descriptiveness, Customary Usage, Acquired Distinctiveness, Denomination of Coins
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Royal Mint Limited
Appellant (applicant)
The Commonwealth Mint and Philatelic Bureau Limited
Respondent (opponent)
Procedural Posture
Trade Mark Appeal / Appeal From Trade Marks Registry Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'SOVEREIGN' is excluded from registration under section 3(1)(c) and (d) of the Trade Marks Act 1994
- 2 Whether 'SOVEREIGN' has acquired distinctive character through use
- 3 Whether the Hearing Officer erred in evaluating evidence and legal principles
Ratio Decidendi
The term 'SOVEREIGN' is a denomination and kind of gold commemorative coin, commonly used in the trade and by consumers to describe such coins, including those not produced by the Royal Mint. The evidence did not establish that a significant proportion of the relevant public perceived 'SOVEREIGN' alone as indicating origin from the Royal Mint. Therefore, the mark is excluded from registration under sections 3(1)(c) and (d) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, and has not acquired distinctiveness.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment