The Royal Mint Ltd v The Commonwealth Mint And Philatelic Bureau Ltd [2017] EWHC 417 (Ch) (03 March 2017)
The word 'SOVEREIGN' is a kind of gold commemorative coin and a denomination, is customary in the trade, and has not acquired distinctiveness as a trade mark for The Royal Mint Limited; thus, it is excluded from registration under sections 3(1)(c) and 3(1)(d) of the Trade Marks Act 1994.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 417 (Ch)
- Parties
- Appellant (applicant): The Royal Mint Limited; Respondent (opponent): The Commonwealth Mint and Philatelic Bureau Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Trade Mark Appeal / Appeal From Trade Marks Registry Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Absolute Grounds for Refusal of Trade Mark Registration, Descriptiveness, Customary Usage, Acquired Distinctiveness, Denomination of Coins
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Royal Mint Limited
Appellant (applicant)
The Commonwealth Mint and Philatelic Bureau Limited
Respondent (opponent)
Procedural Posture
Trade Mark Appeal / Appeal From Trade Marks Registry Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'SOVEREIGN' is excluded from registration under sections 3(1)(c) and 3(1)(d) of the Trade Marks Act 1994
- 2 Whether 'SOVEREIGN' has acquired distinctive character through use
Ratio Decidendi
The word 'SOVEREIGN' is a kind of gold commemorative coin and a denomination, is customary in the trade, and has not acquired distinctiveness as a trade mark for The Royal Mint Limited; thus, it is excluded from registration under sections 3(1)(c) and 3(1)(d) of the Trade Marks Act 1994.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for registration of 'SOVEREIGN' as a trade mark refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment