The Secretary of State for Health & Anor v Servier Laboratories Limited & Ors

The Secretary of State for Health & Anor v Servier Laboratories Limited & Ors

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge was entitled to determine the preliminary issue on a general basis without further disclosure from individual PCTs/Health Boards, as this approach was consistent with prior case management decisions and the overriding objective. Servier failed to articulate any clear, general standards for mitigation that could be applied across all PCTs/Health Boards, and thus could not complain that the judge did not rule on such standards. The appeal was dismissed.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: The Secretary of State for Health; Claimant/respondent: The NHS Business Services Authority; Claimant/respondent: The Scottish Ministers and Others; Claimant/respondent: The Welsh Ministers and Others; Defendant/appellant: Servier Laboratories Limited; Defendant/appellant: Servier Research and Development Limited; Defendant/appellant: Les Laboratoires Servier SAS; Defendant/appellant: Servier SAS
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Abuse of Dominant Position, Anti Competitive Agreements, Mitigation of Loss, Disclosure, Damages for Breach of Competition Law
Competition Law Pharmaceutical Regulation Civil Procedure Abuse of Dominant Position Anti Competitive Agreements Mitigation of Loss Disclosure Damages for Breach of Competition Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Secretary of State for Health

Claimant/respondent

The NHS Business Services Authority

Claimant/respondent

The Scottish Ministers and Others

Claimant/respondent

The Welsh Ministers and Others

Claimant/respondent

Servier Laboratories Limited

Defendant/appellant

Servier Research and Development Limited

Defendant/appellant

Les Laboratoires Servier SAS

Defendant/appellant

Servier SAS

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Preliminary Issues

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimants failed unreasonably to mitigate their losses by not encouraging switching from perindopril to cheaper ACE inhibitors
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred in dismissing the entirety of Servier's mitigation defence on preliminary issue (c) without further disclosure
  3. 3 Whether the judge should have allowed Servier to pursue its mitigation defence in relation to individual PCTs/Health Boards

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge was entitled to determine the preliminary issue on a general basis without further disclosure from individual PCTs/Health Boards, as this approach was consistent with prior case management decisions and the overriding objective. Servier failed to articulate any clear, general standards for mitigation that could be applied across all PCTs/Health Boards, and thus could not complain that the judge did not rule on such standards. The appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; High Court judgment on preliminary issues affirmed