Perotti v Collyer-Bristow (A Firm) (No 2)

Perotti v Collyer-Bristow (A Firm) (No 2)

The appellant is not entitled to renewed submissions on the merits or an absolute right to an oral hearing in the Court of Appeal; only minor corrections to the judgment text are permitted.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Angelo Perotti; Defendants/respondents: Collyer-Bristow (A Firm) (No 2)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 July 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Directions and Corrections
Outcome
Order for corrections and directions confirmed; stay on sale of property lifted.
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Right of Access to Court, Oral Hearing, Correction of Judgment
Civil Procedure Abuse of Process Right of Access to Court Oral Hearing Correction of Judgment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Angelo Perotti

Claimant/appellant

Collyer-Bristow (A Firm) (No 2)

Defendants/respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Directions and Corrections

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to further submissions on the merits after judgment
  2. 2 Whether the appellant has an absolute right to an oral hearing in the Court of Appeal under Article 6(1) ECHR or common law
  3. 3 Whether the court should make corrections to the judgment text as requested by the appellant

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant is not entitled to renewed submissions on the merits or an absolute right to an oral hearing in the Court of Appeal; only minor corrections to the judgment text are permitted.

Court Disposition

Order for corrections and directions confirmed; stay on sale of property lifted.

Orders

  • Specified corrections to the judgment text are allowed as detailed.
  • Order made on 21st May to be drawn up and sealed.