Otkritie Capital International Ltd & Anor v threadneedle Asset Management Ltd & Anor

Otkritie Capital International Ltd & Anor v threadneedle Asset Management Ltd & Anor

Non-compliance with the Aldi guidelines does not automatically constitute abuse of process warranting strike out; the judge must conduct a broad merits-based assessment considering all circumstances, including seriousness of breach and hypothetical scenario. The judge's evaluation that joinder would not have been ordered and that Otkritie's conduct, while below standard, did not justify strike out, was correct. The costs order marking disapproval of Otkritie's conduct was within the judge's discretion.

Parties
Respondent/appellant: Otkritie Capital International Ltd; Respondent/appellant: JSC Otkritie Holding; Appellant/respondent: Threadneedle Asset Management Limited; Appellant/respondent: Threadneedle Management Services Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 April 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Costs Order
Outcome
Appeal, respondent's notice, and cross-appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Case Management, Joinder of Parties, Costs Orders, Vicarious Liability
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Abuse of Process Case Management Joinder of Parties Costs Orders Vicarious Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Otkritie Capital International Ltd

Respondent/appellant

JSC Otkritie Holding

Respondent/appellant

Threadneedle Asset Management Limited

Appellant/respondent

Threadneedle Management Services Limited

Appellant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Costs Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether failure to comply with the Aldi guidelines constitutes abuse of process warranting strike out
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in considering the hypothetical scenario of joinder
  3. 3 Appropriateness of costs order against Otkritie for non-compliance with Aldi guidelines

Ratio Decidendi

Non-compliance with the Aldi guidelines does not automatically constitute abuse of process warranting strike out; the judge must conduct a broad merits-based assessment considering all circumstances, including seriousness of breach and hypothetical scenario. The judge's evaluation that joinder would not have been ordered and that Otkritie's conduct, while below standard, did not justify strike out, was correct. The costs order marking disapproval of Otkritie's conduct was within the judge's discretion.

Court Disposition

Appeal, respondent's notice, and cross-appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Action 2 not struck out; proceedings continue.
  • Otkritie to pay 75% of Threadneedle's costs of the application.