Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin Secretary of State for the Home Department
The appeal is dismissed. The proceedings are an abuse of process under both Hunter and Jameel principles due to the claimant's conviction by the International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh, the longstanding and widespread publication of the allegations, the impossibility of a fair trial of justification after 50 years, and the lack of any worthwhile vindication of reputation. The data protection claims are also abusive as they overlap with the libel claim.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (order Striking Out Claim as Abuse of Process)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order striking out claim as abuse of process upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Libel, Hunter Abuse, Jameel Abuse, GDPR, Data Protection Act 2018, Collateral Attack on Foreign Conviction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (order Striking Out Claim as Abuse of Process)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim for libel and breach of data protection law should be struck out as an abuse of process (Hunter and Jameel abuse)
- 2 Whether reliance on a foreign criminal conviction constitutes Hunter abuse
- 3 Whether the proceedings serve any legitimate purpose in vindicating reputation given prior publications and conviction
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed. The proceedings are an abuse of process under both Hunter and Jameel principles due to the claimant's conviction by the International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh, the longstanding and widespread publication of the allegations, the impossibility of a fair trial of justification after 50 years, and the lack of any worthwhile vindication of reputation. The data protection claims are also abusive as they overlap with the libel claim.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court order striking out claim as abuse of process upheld.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Permission to amend grounds of appeal (Ground 8) granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment